Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation

What is Atrial Fibrillation and How Might It Affect You?
Have you recently been told you have atrial fibrillation (AF)? Or perhaps your smartwatch flagged an irregular heart rhythm? As a cardiologist specialising in heart rhythm disorders, I see patients every week who are confused and concerned about their AF diagnosis and worry about what this means in terms of heart disease.
What is Atrial fibrillation (AF)
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm disorder, affecting the upper chambers of your heart called the atria. In normal circumstances, your heart beats in a regular, coordinated rhythm controlled by electrical signals. With atrial fibrillation, these electrical signals become chaotic and disorganised, causing the atria to quiver or "fibrillate" rather than contract effectively. This irregular rhythm means your heart cannot pump blood as efficiently as it should, and blood may pool in the atria, potentially forming dangerous clots. While AF itself is rarely immediately life-threatening, it significantly increases your risk of stroke because of a blood clot, and can lead to heart failure if left untreated. The condition affects nearly 1.5 million people in the UK, with numbers expected to double by 2050 as our population ages.
AF can be paroxysmal (coming and going in episodes that typically last less than 7 days and often stop spontaneously) or persistent (continuing for more than 7 days or requiring medical intervention to restore normal rhythm). Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is particularly common in younger patients and generally responds better to treatment, though both types can significantly impact your quality of life and require specialist care.
While some of my patients experience noticeable symptoms like heart palpitations or shortness of breath, others feel perfectly fine and are surprised when AF is discovered during a routine check-up.
The Unexpected Nature of an AF Diagnosis
One of the most common reactions I see is surprise. Many of my patients are athletic, very fit individuals in their 40s and 50s who never expected to have any heart problems. I remember one particular patient – a super-fit gentleman who regularly did weightlifting and was extremely active. When he developed atrial flutter (a close cousin of AF), he was genuinely shocked that someone so healthy could develop a heart rhythm disorder.
This reaction is completely understandable, but it's important to know that AF doesn't discriminate based on fitness level. Even high-profile individuals like former Prime Minister Tony Blair have undergone treatment for heart rhythm disorders. These aren't "old people's heart problems" – this can affect anyone, regardless of how healthy and active they are.

How People Discover They Have AF
Your journey with AF might have started in several ways, and increasingly, technology is playing a crucial role in early detection.

Why You Shouldn't Wait to Treat Your AF
If you've been diagnosed with AF, you might be wondering whether it needs immediate attention or if a "wait and see" approach is acceptable. From my extensive clinical experience and the latest research, I can tell you that addressing AF promptly leads to significantly better outcomes.
The clinical evidence is clear: treating AF earlier rather than later gives you the best chance of returning to normal rhythm long-term, which is hugely important, and in certain groups of patients reduces the chances of developing heart failure. When I perform an AF ablation (the most effective treatment for many patients) within a year or two of diagnosis, your chances of success are dramatically higher than if we wait several years.
Unfortunately, if you're relying on the NHS pathway, you might face significant delays. After seeing your GP, you'll likely be referred to a general cardiologist before finally seeing an electrophysiologist (a heart rhythm specialist like myself). Once you're on the waiting list for an ablation, you could wait another year. By that point, your chances of a successful outcome have already diminished significantly.
How Timing Affects Your Treatment Success
Let me share what I've seen in my practice regarding success rates:
If you're relatively young and healthy with paroxysmal AF (where symptoms come and go), and we treat you promptly, your chance of successful treatment exceeds 80%. However, if your AF has become persistent (continuous), those odds drop to about 60-70%.
The longer you wait, particularly if you follow the typical NHS timeline of 18+ months from diagnosis to treatment, your success rate for persistent AF can fall below 50%.
What Treatment Options Do You Have?
When you come to see me with AF, we'll discuss several treatment approaches based on your specific situation.
For some patients, I recommend a cardioversion as a first step. This procedure temporarily restores normal heart rhythm and helps us determine how much your symptoms improve in normal rhythm. It's also useful if there's a clear trigger for your AF, such as excessive alcohol consumption or thyroid problems, which we can address alongside the cardioversion.
For many patients, an AF ablation offers the most definitive solution. This is particularly true if your AF is paroxysmal, if you're significantly affected by symptoms, or if your AF is beginning to affect your heart's pumping function (which can lead to heart failure if left untreated).
What Happens During an Atrial Fibrillation Ablation?
If we decide an ablation is right for you, here's what you can expect from start to finish:


What Are the Risks of AF Ablation?
I believe in being completely transparent about risks. For AF ablation, I tell my patients to consider two key numbers: 3% and 1 in 1,000.
The 3% represents the risk of complications that are fixable but might require a longer hospital stay. These include things like vascular injury where we insert the catheters, fluid collecting around the heart (pericardial effusion), or temporary nerve damage that typically heals within six months.
The 1 in 1,000 figure represents the risk of more serious complications such as stroke, need for cardiac surgery, or a rare but serious complication called atrial-esophageal fistula. To put this in perspective, this risk is comparable to the everyday risks you take driving in London.
The Cost of AF Treatment
An AF ablation in my private practice costs approximately £22,000. While this represents a significant investment, it's important to consider this in the context of a lifetime of improved quality of life and the potential prevention of serious complications like stroke or heart failure. The cost reflects the sophisticated technology involved, the general anaesthetic for your comfort, overnight monitoring, and the expertise of the entire team caring for you.
When patients ask me about the investment, I often point out that this is less than many people spend on a new car
What Happens If You Don't Treat Your AF?
If you're wondering whether you can simply live with AF, it's important to understand the potential consequences.
Some people do adapt to being in AF and experience minimal symptoms, particularly older patients. However, between 5-10% of patients with untreated AF will develop heart failure that becomes difficult to manage with medications alone.
Even if you feel fine now, AF typically reduces your exercise capacity and quality of life over time, often in ways you might not immediately notice. Many of my patients are surprised by how much better they feel after successful treatment, even those who didn't think their AF was causing significant symptoms.

Can Lifestyle Changes Help Your AF?
Absolutely. In my practice, I've seen remarkable improvements in some patients who make targeted lifestyle changes:
Weight management is particularly important. If you're carrying extra weight, losing even a moderate amount can significantly improve your chances of success with ablation or even help manage AF without a procedure.
Alcohol reduction makes a substantial difference for many patients. If you drink regularly, cutting back can noticeably reduce the frequency of your AF episodes.
While medications like beta-blockers can help control symptoms and rate in some cases, most patients with AF will need to remain on anticoagulants (blood thinners) to reduce stroke risk, regardless of whether they choose ablation or medication management.
Making the Right Decision for Your Heart
Living with atrial fibrillation doesn't mean you have to accept a reduced quality of life or worry about long-term heart damage. With early intervention and the right specialist care, most of my patients return to normal rhythm and enjoy all their usual activities without limitations.
The key is not waiting until it's too late for optimal treatment. If you've been diagnosed with AF or suspect you might have it, seeking specialist care promptly gives you the best chance for a complete recovery and protects your heart health for years to come.
Remember, this isn't about age or fitness level – AF can affect anyone. But with modern technology for diagnosis, sophisticated treatment options, and the right specialist care, you can expect to return to your full, active life. The surprise of an AF diagnosis doesn't have to define your future – with proper treatment, it can simply be a brief chapter in your ongoing story of good health.
Atrial Fibrillation in the UK: The Numbers
Understanding the scope of atrial fibrillation in the UK helps put your condition into perspective:
Nearly 1.5 million people in the UK are living with atrial fibrillation, making it the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. Even more concerning, experts believe there are hundreds of thousands more undiagnosed cases.
The prevalence of AF increases dramatically with age—while it affects less than 1% of people under 60, this rises to over 10% in those aged 80 and above. With our aging population, the number of AF cases is expected to double by 2050.
AF accounts for approximately 20% of all strokes in the UK, and these strokes tend to be more severe than strokes from other causes. Proper anticoagulation can reduce this risk by up to 70%, but many patients remain inadequately treated.
Most troubling is the "treatment gap" we see in the UK. While early intervention provides the best outcomes, the average time from diagnosis to specialist treatment in the NHS exceeds 18 months—far longer than the optimal treatment window.
The cost to the NHS for managing AF and its complications exceeds £2.2 billion annually. Earlier intervention would not only improve patient outcomes but could significantly reduce this financial burden on our healthcare system.
Frequently Asked Questions About Atrial Fibrillation
The Science Behind Early Intervention for AF
The recommendation for early intervention in atrial fibrillation isn't just based on clinical experience—it's supported by robust scientific evidence:
The landmark EAST-AFNET 4 trial, published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2020, demonstrated that early rhythm control therapy (within 1 year of diagnosis) was associated with a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes compared to usual care. This large randomized trial involving 2,789 patients showed a significant reduction in the composite outcome of cardiovascular death, stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure or acute coronary syndrome.¹
For ablation specifically, the CABANA trial showed that catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, compared with medical therapy, led to clinically important and significant improvements in quality of life that were maintained for at least 5 years.²
A 2021 meta-analysis published in the European Heart Journal found that AF ablation was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization compared to medical therapy alone, particularly when performed early in the disease course.³
The CASTLE-AF study demonstrated that catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure was associated with a significantly lower rate of death and hospitalization for worsening heart failure than medical therapy.⁴
Research published in Heart Rhythm in 2018 showed that delaying ablation by 12 months or more after diagnosis was associated with significantly lower success rates and higher rates of progression to persistent AF, supporting the "AF begets AF" concept where the arrhythmia causes electrical and structural changes that make it harder to treat over time.⁵
In the EARLY-AF trial, patients who had ablation as an initial treatment for AF versus medications were approximately 50% less likely to have AF one year later.6